Home: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 13: Line 13:
== WikiCitingRetracted (Content contribution) ==
== WikiCitingRetracted (Content contribution) ==


<div style="text-align:justify">[[File:Template CitingRetracted2.png|alt=Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.|thumb|Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.]]To contribute to WL-CitingRetracted is fairly simple, and quite similar to creating a Wikipedia article.
<div style="text-align:justify">
 
[[File:Template CitingRetracted2.png|alt=Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.|thumb|Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.]]To contribute to WL-CitingRetracted is fairly simple, and quite similar to creating a Wikipedia article.


A similar written explanation for consideration:
A similar written explanation for consideration:
Line 30: Line 32:


From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.
From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.
</div>


== WikiCitingRetracted (Structure) ==
== WikiCitingRetracted (Structure) ==


<div style="text-align:justify">
<div style="text-align:justify">
It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about the article being commented upon and the article providing the comments. See examples below


Note: Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.
It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about an article which cited a retraction. You may click on (Random page) at the left-menu to see a random page as an example. Alternatively, see the example below
 
* [https://wikicitingretracted.org/index.php?title=Functional_characterization_of_brain_tumors_an_overview_of_the_potential_clinical_value Example of a WikiCitingRetracted]
 
'''Note:''' Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.


</div>
</div>


== {{#fas:scroll}} WikiLetters.org ==
== {{#fas:scroll}} WikiLetters.org ==
<div style="text-align:justify">


[https://www.wikiletters.org WikiLetters.org] is a dynamic-database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:
[https://www.wikiletters.org WikiLetters.org] is a dynamic-database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:
Line 84: Line 93:
  * [https://retractionwatch.com RetractionWatch (news about retractions)]
  * [https://retractionwatch.com RetractionWatch (news about retractions)]
  * [https://pubpeer.com PubPeer (notes)]
  * [https://pubpeer.com PubPeer (notes)]
</div>


== Comments ==
== Comments ==
In WikiCitingRetracted you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using the box below.
<div style="text-align:justify">
<br />-- [[User:Anduttawikierratum1981|Anduttawikierratum1981]] ([[User talk:Anduttawikierratum1981|talk]]) 13:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Here you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using this space below.
</div>

Latest revision as of 00:54, 18 August 2022

WikiCitingRetracted (About)Edit

WikiCitingRetracted (WC) is an independent platform supported by WikiLetters. WikiCitingRetracted is complementary to a number of other platforms supporting science. It allows journals, scientists, researchers, students and maybe others to store the meta information about articles that have cited a retraction or retracted-article. In other words, the meta about both articles that may have merely cited a retraction or used relevant information such as data, invalid-method and others.

Citing a retraction is becoming more common than you think in the current peer-review system, however, we are missing keeping track of these connections so that WikiCitingRetracted aims to cover this aspect to better support science.

Following the wiki-ecosystem, here you are not required to provide your personal details, and here your submitted connections becomes available online instantaneously so others can have access to all. Furthermore, WL-CitingRetraction gives you the opportunity to append the citation piece, which is most likely to be a "neutral citation" (~ 95% chance). And please remember, the freedom you have here is very much in the core of a wiki-ecosystem.

WikiCitingRetracted (Content contribution)Edit

 
Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.
To contribute to WL-CitingRetracted is fairly simple, and quite similar to creating a Wikipedia article.

A similar written explanation for consideration:

, and a few tutorials for consideration:

You need to initially search for the full title of an article that "cited a retraction" (e.g. TITLE-A) inside WkiCitingRetracted to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence:

Create the page "TITLE-A" on this wiki!

From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.

WikiCitingRetracted (Structure)Edit

It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about an article which cited a retraction. You may click on (Random page) at the left-menu to see a random page as an example. Alternatively, see the example below

Note: Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.

WikiLetters.orgEdit

WikiLetters.org is a dynamic-database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:

WL-LettersEdit

A database providing Letters of caveats about papers.

WikiCommentsEdit

A database providing peer-reviewed Comments about papers.

WikiCitingRetractedEdit

A database displaying articles that cited retractions.

WikiRetractedEdit

A database displaying articles retracted from the scientific system.

WikiErratumEdit

A database displaying minor corrections about papers in the level of Erratum / Corrigendum / Improper-Citation.

WikiLivingReviewsEdit

A database to support Living Reviews based upon a Wiki-ecosystem.

WL-Systematic Review SREdit

A dynamic-method for Systematic Reviews.

WikiJournal of ScienceEdit

A scientific journal free and transparent in all levels.

WikiDataEdit

A system connecting information and data to humans and machines under the wiki-ecosystem.

ScholiaEdit

A bridge between Wikidata and Science.

WikiCiteEdit

A system processing citations to strengthen Wikipedia articles.

Wikiversity Edit

A bridge between Universities and the Wiki-ecosystem.

Additional relevant databasesEdit

* RetractionWatch (news about retractions)
* PubPeer (notes)

CommentsEdit

Here you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using this space below.