Home
WikiLetters.org
WikiLetters.org is a dynamic-database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:
WL-Letters
A database providing Letters of caveats about papers.
WikiComments
A database providing peer-reviewed Comments about papers.
WikiCitingRetracted
A database displaying articles that cited retractions.
WikiRetracted
A database displaying articles retracted from the scientific system.
WikiErratum
A database displaying minor corrections about papers in the level of Erratum / Corrigendum / Improper-Citation.
WikiLivingReviews
A database to support Living Reviews based upon a Wiki-ecosystem.
WL-Systematic Review SR
A dynamic-method for Systematic Reviews.
WikiJournal of Science
A scientific journal free and transparent in all levels.
WikiData
A system connecting information and data to humans and machines under the wiki-ecosystem.
Scholia
A bridge between Wikidata and Science.
WikiCite
A system processing citations to strengthen Wikipedia articles.
Wikiversity
A bridge between Universities and the Wiki-ecosystem.
Additional relevant databases
* RetractionWatch (news about retractions) * PubPeer (notes)
WikiCitingRetracted (About)
WikiCitingRetracted (WC) is an independent platform supported by WikiLetters. WikiCitingRetracted is complementary to a number of other platforms supporting science. It allows journals, scientists, researchers, students and maybe others to store the meta information about articles that have cited a retraction or retracted-article. In other words, the meta about both articles that may have merely cited a retraction or used relevant information such as data, invalid-method and others.
Citing a retraction is becoming more common than you think in the current peer-review system, however, we are missing keeping track of these connections so that WikiCitingRetracted aims to cover this aspect to better support science.
Following the wiki-ecosystem, here you are not required to provide your personal details, and here your submitted connections becomes available online instantaneously so others can have access to all. Furthermore, WL-CitingRetraction gives you the opportunity to append the citation piece, which is most likely to be a "neutral citation" (~ 95% chance). And please remember, the freedom you have here is very much in the core of a wiki-ecosystem.
WikiCitingRetracted (Content contribution)
A similar written explanation for consideration:
, and a few tutorials for consideration:
You need to initially search for the full title of an article that "cited a retraction" (e.g. TITLE-A) inside WkiCitingRetracted to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence:
Create the page "TITLE-A" on this wiki!
From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.
WikiCitingRetracted (Structure)
It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about the article being commented upon and the article providing the comments. See examples below
Note: Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.
Comments
In WikiCitingRetracted you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using the box below.
-- Anduttawikierratum1981 (talk) 13:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)