Home: Difference between revisions

From WikiCitingRetracted
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== {{#fas:scroll}} WikiLetters.org ==
== {{#fas:scroll}} WikiLetters.org ==


[https://www.wikiletters.org WikiLetters.org] is a dynamical database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:
[https://www.wikiletters.org WikiLetters.org] is a dynamic-database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:
 
[https://www.wikiletters.org WikiLetters.org] is a dynamical database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:


* [https://wikiletters.net Wiki-Letters (Letters of caveats about papers)]
* [https://wikiletters.net Wiki-Letters (Letters of caveats about papers)]
* [https://wikicomments.org WikiComments (Peer-reviewed Comments about papers]
* [https://wikicomments.org WikiComments (Peer-reviewed Comments about papers]
* [https://wikicitingretracted.org WikiCitingRetracted (Papers that cited retractions)]
* [https://wikicitingretracted.org WikiCitingRetracted (Papers that cited retractions)]
* [https://wikiretracted.org WikiRetracted (Papers retracted from the scientific system)]
* [https://wikierratum.org WikiErratum (Minor corrections about papers in the level of Erratum/Corrigendum/Improper-Citation)]
* [https://wikierratum.org WikiErratum (Minor corrections about papers in the level of Erratum/Corrigendum/Improper-Citation)]
* [https://wikiretracted.org WikiRetracted (Papers retracted from the scientific system)]
* [https://archive.org/details/wikiletters-systematic-review WL-Systematic Review SR (a dynamic-method suggested for SR)]
* [https://archive.org/details/wikiletters-systematic-review WL-Systematic Review SR (a dynamical-method suggested for SR)]
* [https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Science/About WikiJournal of Science (A scientific journal free and transparent in all levels)]
* [https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Science/About WikiJournal of Science (A scientific journal free and transparent in all levels)]
* [https://scholia.toolforge.org/ Scholia (A bridge between Wikidata and Science)]
* [https://scholia.toolforge.org/ Scholia (A bridge between Wikidata and Science)]
* [https://www.wikidata.org WikiData (Hosting scientific information under the Wiki-ecosystem)]
* [https://www.wikidata.org WikiData (Connecting data to humans and machines)]
* [https://wikicite.org/ WikiCite (Processing Citations that strengthen Wikipedia articles)]
* [https://wikicite.org/ WikiCite (Processing Citations that strengthen Wikipedia articles)]
* [https://en.wikiversity.org Wikiversity (A bridge between Universities and the Wiki-ecosystem)]
* [https://en.wikiversity.org Wikiversity (A bridge between Universities and the Wiki-ecosystem)]

Revision as of 11:42, 19 July 2022

WikiLetters.org

WikiLetters.org is a dynamic-database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:

Additional very important systems supporting better science

WikiCitingRetracted (About)

WikiCitingRetracted (WC) is an independent platform supported by WikiLetters. WikiCitingRetracted is complementary to a number of other platforms supporting science. It allows journals, scientists, researchers, students and maybe others to store the meta information about articles that have cited a retraction or retracted-article. In other words, the meta about both articles that may have merely cited a retraction or used relevant information such as data, invalid-method and others.

Citing a retraction is becoming more common than you think in the current peer-review system, however, we are missing keeping track of these connections so that WikiCitingRetracted aims to cover this aspect to better support science.

Following the wiki-ecosystem, here you are not required to provide your personal details, and here your submitted connections becomes available online instantaneously so others can have access to all. Furthermore, WL-CitingRetraction gives you the opportunity to append the citation piece, which is most likely to be a "neutral citation" (~ 95% chance). And please remember, the freedom you have here is very much in the core of a wiki-ecosystem.

WikiCitingRetracted (Content contribution)

Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.
Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.
To contribute to WL-CitingRetracted is fairly simple, and quite similar to creating a Wikipedia article.

A similar written explanation for consideration:

, and a few tutorials for consideration:

You need to initially search for the full title of an article that "cited a retraction" (e.g. TITLE-A) inside WkiCitingRetracted to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence:

Create the page "TITLE-A" on this wiki!

From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.

WikiCitingRetracted (Structure)

It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about the article being commented upon and the article providing the comments. See examples below

Note: Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.

Comments

In WikiCitingRetracted you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using the box below.
-- Anduttawikierratum1981 (talk) 13:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)