Home: Difference between revisions

From WikiCitingRetracted
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 44: Line 44:


From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.
From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.
== WikiCitingRetracted (Structure) ==
<div style="text-align:justify">
It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about the article being commented upon and the article providing the comments. See examples below
Note: Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.
</div>


== Comments ==
== Comments ==
In WikiCitingRetracted you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using the box below.
In WikiCitingRetracted you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using the box below.
<br />-- [[User:Anduttawikierratum1981|Anduttawikierratum1981]] ([[User talk:Anduttawikierratum1981|talk]]) 13:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
<br />-- [[User:Anduttawikierratum1981|Anduttawikierratum1981]] ([[User talk:Anduttawikierratum1981|talk]]) 13:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:17, 14 July 2022

WikiLetters.org

WikiLetters.org is a dynamical database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:

WikiCitingRetracted (About)

WikiCitingRetracted (WC) is an independent platform supported by WikiLetters. WikiCitingRetracted is complementary to a number of other platforms supporting science. It allows journals, scientists, researchers, students and maybe others to store the meta information about articles that have cited a retraction or retracted-article. In other words, the meta about both articles that may have merely cited a retraction or used relevant information such as data, invalid-method and others.

Citing a retraction is becoming more common than you think in the current peer-review system, however, we are missing keeping track of these connections so that WikiCitingRetracted aims to cover this aspect to better support science.

Following the wiki-ecosystem, here you are not required to provide your personal details, and here your submitted connections becomes available online instantaneously so others can have access to all. Furthermore, WL-CitingRetraction gives you the opportunity to append the citation piece, which is most likely to be a "neutral citation" (~ 95% chance). And please remember, the freedom you have here is very much in the core of a wiki-ecosystem.

WikiCitingRetracted (Content contribution)

Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.
Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.
To contribute to WL-CitingRetracted is fairly simple, and quite similar to creating a Wikipedia article.

A similar written explanation for consideration:

, and a few tutorials for consideration:

You need to initially search for the full title of an article that "cited a retraction" (e.g. TITLE-A) inside WkiCitingRetracted to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence:

Create the page "TITLE-A" on this wiki!

From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.

WikiCitingRetracted (Structure)

It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about the article being commented upon and the article providing the comments. See examples below

Note: Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.

Comments

In WikiCitingRetracted you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using the box below.
-- Anduttawikierratum1981 (talk) 13:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)