Home: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information. | From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information. | ||
== WikiCitingRetracted (Structure) == | |||
<div style="text-align:justify"> | |||
It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about the article being commented upon and the article providing the comments. See examples below | |||
Note: Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed. | |||
</div> | |||
== Comments == | == Comments == | ||
In WikiCitingRetracted you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using the box below. | In WikiCitingRetracted you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using the box below. | ||
<br />-- [[User:Anduttawikierratum1981|Anduttawikierratum1981]] ([[User talk:Anduttawikierratum1981|talk]]) 13:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC) | <br />-- [[User:Anduttawikierratum1981|Anduttawikierratum1981]] ([[User talk:Anduttawikierratum1981|talk]]) 13:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:17, 14 July 2022
WikiLetters.org
WikiLetters.org is a dynamical database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:
- Wiki-Letters
- WikiComments
- WikiCitingRetracted
- WikiErratum
- Wikiversity
- Scholia
- WikiJournal of Science
- WikiData
- WikiCite
WikiCitingRetracted (About)
WikiCitingRetracted (WC) is an independent platform supported by WikiLetters. WikiCitingRetracted is complementary to a number of other platforms supporting science. It allows journals, scientists, researchers, students and maybe others to store the meta information about articles that have cited a retraction or retracted-article. In other words, the meta about both articles that may have merely cited a retraction or used relevant information such as data, invalid-method and others.
Citing a retraction is becoming more common than you think in the current peer-review system, however, we are missing keeping track of these connections so that WikiCitingRetracted aims to cover this aspect to better support science.
Following the wiki-ecosystem, here you are not required to provide your personal details, and here your submitted connections becomes available online instantaneously so others can have access to all. Furthermore, WL-CitingRetraction gives you the opportunity to append the citation piece, which is most likely to be a "neutral citation" (~ 95% chance). And please remember, the freedom you have here is very much in the core of a wiki-ecosystem.
WikiCitingRetracted (Content contribution)
A similar written explanation for consideration:
, and a few tutorials for consideration:
You need to initially search for the full title of an article that "cited a retraction" (e.g. TITLE-A) inside WkiCitingRetracted to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence:
Create the page "TITLE-A" on this wiki!
From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.
WikiCitingRetracted (Structure)
It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about the article being commented upon and the article providing the comments. See examples below
Note: Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.
Comments
In WikiCitingRetracted you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using the box below.
-- Anduttawikierratum1981 (talk) 13:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)