Home: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== {{#fas:database}} WikiLetters.org (WL) == | |||
* [https://www.wikiletters.org WikiLetters.org] | |||
WL is a dynamical database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). More details about WL are as follows: | |||
* [https:// | |||
* [https:// | * [https://wikiletters.org/about.php WL-ABOUT] | ||
* [https:// | * [https://wikiletters.org/rationale.php WL-RATIONALE] | ||
* [https://www. | |||
* [https://www. | == {{#fas:scroll}} WL-CitingRetracted (About) == | ||
<div style="text-align:justify"> | |||
WikiCitingRetracted (WC) is an independent platform supported by WikiLetters. WikiCitingRetracted is complementary to a number of other platforms supporting science. It allows journals, scientists, researchers, students and maybe others to store the meta information about articles which have been intensively commented by another article. In other words, the meta about both articles critically assessed and the article assessor. These connections ought to benefit other researchers aiming to read and maybe even use contents from the article being commented upon, because other researchers can then read these comments and benefit from it. | |||
Articles of comments are very similar to any other article. However, comments are quite often a thoughtfully discussion towards someone's finding. However, the current system of science is very much overloaded so that this special category of articles tend to be lost amongst the so many traditional articles merely commenting another one (~90-95% of all citations are neutral). | |||
Following the wiki-ecosystem, here you are not required to provide your personal details, and here your submitted connections becomes available online instantaneously so others can have access to all. | |||
Furthermore, WL-Comments gives you the opportunity to provide a brief discussion about the comment and even highlight the key-points an article provided about another one (e.g. a brief summary). The freedom you have here is very much in the core of a wiki-ecosystem. | |||
</div> | |||
== {{#fas:scroll}} WL-CitingRetracted (Content contribution) == | |||
<div style="text-align:justify">To contribute to WL-CitingRetracted is fairly simple, and quite similar to creating a Wikipedia article. | |||
A similar written explanation for consideration: | |||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_create_a_page Wikipedia explanation] | |||
, and a few tutorials for consideration: | |||
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBCxb9oaz5s Youtube-tutorial] | |||
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_k_VbCDm2Y Youtube-tutorial] | |||
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CwiZIsaM7s Youtube-tutorial] | |||
You need to initially search for the full title of an article (e.g. TITLE-A) inside WL-Letters to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence: | |||
<span style="background:#c0c0c0">Create the page "<span style="color:#ff0000">'''TITLE-A'''</span>" on this wiki!</span> | |||
From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new WL-Erratum. | |||
== Comments == | |||
In WL-CitingRetracted you have the freedom to append information at any time. | |||
<br />-- [[User:Anduttawikierratum1981|Anduttawikierratum1981]] ([[User talk:Anduttawikierratum1981|talk]]) 13:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:54, 8 July 2022
WikiLetters.org (WL)
WL is a dynamical database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). More details about WL are as follows:
WL-CitingRetracted (About)
WikiCitingRetracted (WC) is an independent platform supported by WikiLetters. WikiCitingRetracted is complementary to a number of other platforms supporting science. It allows journals, scientists, researchers, students and maybe others to store the meta information about articles which have been intensively commented by another article. In other words, the meta about both articles critically assessed and the article assessor. These connections ought to benefit other researchers aiming to read and maybe even use contents from the article being commented upon, because other researchers can then read these comments and benefit from it.
Articles of comments are very similar to any other article. However, comments are quite often a thoughtfully discussion towards someone's finding. However, the current system of science is very much overloaded so that this special category of articles tend to be lost amongst the so many traditional articles merely commenting another one (~90-95% of all citations are neutral).
Following the wiki-ecosystem, here you are not required to provide your personal details, and here your submitted connections becomes available online instantaneously so others can have access to all.
Furthermore, WL-Comments gives you the opportunity to provide a brief discussion about the comment and even highlight the key-points an article provided about another one (e.g. a brief summary). The freedom you have here is very much in the core of a wiki-ecosystem.
WL-CitingRetracted (Content contribution)
A similar written explanation for consideration:
, and a few tutorials for consideration:
You need to initially search for the full title of an article (e.g. TITLE-A) inside WL-Letters to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence:
Create the page "TITLE-A" on this wiki!
From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new WL-Erratum.
Comments
In WL-CitingRetracted you have the freedom to append information at any time.
-- Anduttawikierratum1981 (talk) 13:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)