Home: Difference between revisions

From WikiCitingRetracted
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(32 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== {{#fas:database}} WikiLetters.org (WL) ==
== WikiCitingRetracted (About) ==
 
* [https://www.wikiletters.org WikiLetters.org]
 
WL is a dynamical database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). More details about WL are as follows:
 
* [https://wikiletters.org/about.php WL-ABOUT]
* [https://wikiletters.org/rationale.php WL-RATIONALE]
 
== {{#fas:scroll}} WL-CitingRetracted (About) ==


<div style="text-align:justify">
<div style="text-align:justify">
Line 20: Line 11:
</div>
</div>


== {{#fas:scroll}} WL-CitingRetracted (Content contribution) ==
== WikiCitingRetracted (Content contribution) ==
 
<div style="text-align:justify">


<div style="text-align:justify">To contribute to WL-CitingRetracted is fairly simple, and quite similar to creating a Wikipedia article.
[[File:Template CitingRetracted2.png|alt=Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.|thumb|Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.]]To contribute to WL-CitingRetracted is fairly simple, and quite similar to creating a Wikipedia article.


A similar written explanation for consideration:
A similar written explanation for consideration:
Line 34: Line 27:
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CwiZIsaM7s Youtube-tutorial]
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CwiZIsaM7s Youtube-tutorial]


You need to initially search for the full title of an article that "<span style="color:#ff0000">'''cited a retraction'''</span>" (e.g. TITLE-A) inside WL-Letters to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence:
You need to initially search for the full title of an article that "<span style="color:#ff0000">'''cited a retraction'''</span>" (e.g. TITLE-A) inside WkiCitingRetracted to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence:


<span style="background:#c0c0c0">Create the page "<span style="color:#ff0000">'''TITLE-A'''</span>" on this wiki!</span>
<span style="background:#c0c0c0">Create the page "<span style="color:#ff0000">'''TITLE-A'''</span>" on this wiki!</span>


From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new WL-Erratum.
From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.
 
</div>
 
== WikiCitingRetracted (Structure) ==
 
<div style="text-align:justify">
 
It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about an article which cited a retraction. You may click on (Random page) at the left-menu to see a random page as an example. Alternatively, see the example below
 
* [https://wikicitingretracted.org/index.php?title=Functional_characterization_of_brain_tumors_an_overview_of_the_potential_clinical_value Example of a WikiCitingRetracted]
 
'''Note:''' Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.
 
</div>
 
== {{#fas:scroll}} WikiLetters.org ==
 
<div style="text-align:justify">
 
[https://www.wikiletters.org WikiLetters.org] is a dynamic-database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:
 
=== [https://wikiletters.net WL-Letters] ===
A database providing Letters of caveats about papers.
 
=== [https://wikicomments.org WikiComments] ===
A database providing peer-reviewed Comments about papers.
 
=== [https://wikicitingretracted.org WikiCitingRetracted] ===
A database displaying articles that cited retractions.
 
=== [https://wikiretracted.org WikiRetracted] ===
A database displaying articles retracted from the scientific system.
 
=== [https://wikierratum.org WikiErratum] ===
A database displaying minor corrections about papers in the level of Erratum / Corrigendum / Improper-Citation.
 
=== [https://wikilivingreviews.org WikiLivingReviews] ===
A database to support Living Reviews based upon a Wiki-ecosystem.
 
=== [https://archive.org/details/wikiletters-systematic-review WL-Systematic Review SR] ===
A dynamic-method for Systematic Reviews.
 
=== [https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_of_Science/About WikiJournal of Science] ===
A scientific journal free and transparent in all levels.
 
=== [https://www.wikidata.org WikiData] ===
A system connecting information and data to humans and machines under the wiki-ecosystem.
 
=== [https://scholia.toolforge.org/ Scholia] ===
A bridge between Wikidata and Science.
 
=== [https://wikicite.org/ WikiCite] ===
A system processing citations to strengthen Wikipedia articles.
 
=== [https://en.wikiversity.org Wikiversity ] ===
A bridge between Universities and the Wiki-ecosystem.
 
=== Additional relevant databases ===
 
* [https://retractionwatch.com RetractionWatch (news about retractions)]
* [https://pubpeer.com PubPeer (notes)]
 
</div>


== Comments ==
== Comments ==
In WikiCitingRetracted you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using the box below.
<div style="text-align:justify">
<br />-- [[User:Anduttawikierratum1981|Anduttawikierratum1981]] ([[User talk:Anduttawikierratum1981|talk]]) 13:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Here you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using this space below.
</div>

Latest revision as of 00:54, 18 August 2022

WikiCitingRetracted (About)[edit | edit source]

WikiCitingRetracted (WC) is an independent platform supported by WikiLetters. WikiCitingRetracted is complementary to a number of other platforms supporting science. It allows journals, scientists, researchers, students and maybe others to store the meta information about articles that have cited a retraction or retracted-article. In other words, the meta about both articles that may have merely cited a retraction or used relevant information such as data, invalid-method and others.

Citing a retraction is becoming more common than you think in the current peer-review system, however, we are missing keeping track of these connections so that WikiCitingRetracted aims to cover this aspect to better support science.

Following the wiki-ecosystem, here you are not required to provide your personal details, and here your submitted connections becomes available online instantaneously so others can have access to all. Furthermore, WL-CitingRetraction gives you the opportunity to append the citation piece, which is most likely to be a "neutral citation" (~ 95% chance). And please remember, the freedom you have here is very much in the core of a wiki-ecosystem.

WikiCitingRetracted (Content contribution)[edit | edit source]

Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.
Figure 1: Suggested template to provide your contribution.
To contribute to WL-CitingRetracted is fairly simple, and quite similar to creating a Wikipedia article.

A similar written explanation for consideration:

, and a few tutorials for consideration:

You need to initially search for the full title of an article that "cited a retraction" (e.g. TITLE-A) inside WkiCitingRetracted to confirm it's non-existence. The confirmation of non-existence would provide you a result displaying the sentence:

Create the page "TITLE-A" on this wiki!

From this point, you are welcome to click over the title in red to create this new information.

WikiCitingRetracted (Structure)[edit | edit source]

It is suggested a very simple structure that contains the information about an article which cited a retraction. You may click on (Random page) at the left-menu to see a random page as an example. Alternatively, see the example below

Note: Please consider the very basic headings displayed in Figure-1. However, if you are welcome to include additional headings and sub-headings whenever needed.

WikiLetters.org[edit | edit source]

WikiLetters.org is a dynamic-database highlighting and integrating what seems to genuinely support science (directly/indirectly). WikiLetters also supports the advancement of the following services for #BuildingBetterScience:

WL-Letters[edit | edit source]

A database providing Letters of caveats about papers.

WikiComments[edit | edit source]

A database providing peer-reviewed Comments about papers.

WikiCitingRetracted[edit | edit source]

A database displaying articles that cited retractions.

WikiRetracted[edit | edit source]

A database displaying articles retracted from the scientific system.

WikiErratum[edit | edit source]

A database displaying minor corrections about papers in the level of Erratum / Corrigendum / Improper-Citation.

WikiLivingReviews[edit | edit source]

A database to support Living Reviews based upon a Wiki-ecosystem.

WL-Systematic Review SR[edit | edit source]

A dynamic-method for Systematic Reviews.

WikiJournal of Science[edit | edit source]

A scientific journal free and transparent in all levels.

WikiData[edit | edit source]

A system connecting information and data to humans and machines under the wiki-ecosystem.

Scholia[edit | edit source]

A bridge between Wikidata and Science.

WikiCite[edit | edit source]

A system processing citations to strengthen Wikipedia articles.

Wikiversity [edit | edit source]

A bridge between Universities and the Wiki-ecosystem.

Additional relevant databases[edit | edit source]

* RetractionWatch (news about retractions)
* PubPeer (notes)

Comments[edit | edit source]

Here you have the freedom to append new information at any time, and to comment in this section using this space below.